The opening chapter of Alice in Wonderland is aptly titled “Down the Rabbit Hole.” Alice’s adventures begin when she follows a rabbit down its hole and consumes items that cause her body to expand and contract. Alice’s journey has been a metaphor for mind-altering experiences ever since.
Some say that the idea of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) as a greenhouse gas solution is equally fraught with unrealistic concepts. The CCS process captures CO2 produced by power plants and compresses it into a liquid. It is then transported to certain geologically receptive areas where it may be injected (or “sequestered”) in porous and permeable rock formations deep below the ground, a mile or more in some cases. Thick layers of dense rock above the porous areas prevent the CO2 from escaping to the atmosphere.
While the process seems straightforward, there are downsides. Primarily, the cost to compress and transport CO2 may be prohibitive. As reported by MIT Technology Review last year, the Boundary Dam project utilized a recently significant advance in CCS technology with the opening of its combined 110-megawatt coal plant in Saskatchewan. The CCS unit consumes 21 percent of the plant’s power, and at $7,300 per kW, the plant is among the most costly generators.
Other obstacles to CCS include the seismic damage and groundwater pollution that may be caused by liquids being pumped underground in large quantities and at high-pressure. The US Geological Survey (USGS) is in the process of studying environmental impacts and geologic storage capabilities in the United States.
Is sequestration realistic? Yes and no. On the scale necessary to have a serious impact, at present, it is more similar to the diminutive Alice who shrinks by drinking from the bottle labeled “Drink Me.” However, sequestration is one of many tools that may come out of a Mad Hatter tea party of suggestions for reducing greenhouse gasses.