Find Us

5 Headquarters

4545 Fuller Dr. Suite 412
Irving, TX 75038
Phone: (972) 445-9584
Toll Free: (855) 275-3483
Fax: (855) 329-3493 
email5@energyby5.com

5 - Northeast

865 State Route 33
Ste 3 PMB 1077
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (732) 774-0005
Fax: (855) 329-3483
email5@energyby5.com

5 - Mexico

CP 11000, Miguel Hidalgo
CDMX, Mexico
Phone: +5595287982
mexico@energyby5.com

LEARN

ERCOT Market 3X-ing Coincident Peak Method, Moving from 4CP to 12CP

June 29, 2026

Written By: Eric Bratcher

ercot_4cp_vs_12cp

Long Story Short

The Texas PUC is proposing to move from a 4-coincident-peak (4CP, the 4 summer months) to a 12-coincident-peak (12CP, every month of the year) methodology for transmission cost allocations.

 

The Move to 12CP

The Public Utility Commission of Texas is considering a significant change to how wholesale transmission costs are assigned and recovered in ERCOT with a target date by Dec. 31, 2026 for implementation. While this may sound like an “inside baseball” regulatory update, customers who have historically managed their 4CPs to control transmission costs will find this game much harder to play. The benefit: less cost avoidance across the board means rates should, in theory, go down. More pressing to legislators is that this makes it much harder for large loads in Texas (defined as over 75 MWs) to avoid their fair share of transmission costs.

 

What’s Changing

Today, ERCOT transmission costs are largely allocated using the 4CP methodology, which ties a customer’s cost responsibility to their demand during the four monthly system peaks in June through September. Because these four peaks can determine a full year of transmission costs, customers have had a strong incentive to curtail during these intervals. That worked well for sophisticated customers who could manage it, but it concentrated cost allocation around a small number of hours. As the Texas grid changes, the PUCT staff argue that a narrow summer-only window no longer reflects how transmission investments are used or caused across the system.

The proposal would replace 4CP with 12CP, meaning transmission costs would be assigned based on coincident peak demand in each of the twelve months of the year. It would also codify the use of 30-minute intervals to measure those peaks. In practical terms, this spreads the cost-allocation signal across the entire year and makes monthly peak management more difficult.

Cost causation and fairness are driving the proposal. Texas is experiencing rapid growth from large electric loads, including data centers, industrial electrification, and other energy-intensive projects. These require major transmission investment, and regulators are increasingly focused on ensuring that the customers and customer classes driving system costs are paying their appropriate share. Moving to 12CP is meant to align transmission cost recovery with year-round grid usage, rather than a limited set of summer peaks that sophisticated customers can strategically avoid. The goal is to reduce cost shifting and tie allocation more closely to how the grid is actually used."

The proposal goes beyond swapping four peaks for twelve. It would require certain Distribution Service Providers to provide ERCOT access to settlement-quality meter data for each Large Load customer in their service territory. That data access matters because accurate, customer-specific demand information is needed to calculate 12CP responsibility and ensure wholesale transmission charges align with retail recovery by rate class. The proposal also adjusts distribution-level billing determinants so costs assigned at the wholesale level flow through more consistently to retail customers. And Large Load customers would face a minimum billing demand, designed to prevent these customers from avoiding transmission responsibility in ways that don’t reflect the infrastructure costs built to serve them.

For customers, the headline is simple: transmission cost exposure may become more continuous, more data-driven, and harder to manage through a few isolated summer curtailment events. Flexible operations can still reduce costs, but a handful of well-timed curtailments probably will not be enough. A more consistent, monthly approach will likely be required.

The proposal also signals where Texas energy policy is heading.

As load growth accelerates, regulators are connecting grid planning, cost recovery, and customer behavior more directly. Customers who understand these changes early can make better decisions about operations, contracting, budgeting, site planning, and demand flexibility. Those who do not may be caught off guard when transmission charges stop depending on a handful of summer peaks and start reflecting their year-round draw on the ERCOT system.



 

Other Recent Posts

Featured Image
2 min read

NYSERDA to hold first pre-sale of Vintage Tier 4 RECs in July

By Eric Bratcher
June 29, 2026

This July, NYSERDA will hold its first Pre-Sale for 2027 vintage Tier 4 RECs. This is the annual opportunity for organizations to buy Tier 4 RECs that can be used to offset electricity usage used in L... READ MORE >
Featured Image
5 min read

5 Key Takeaways from Our "Navigating Energy Markets and the Middle East Conflict" Webinar

By Jon Moore, Eric Bratcher, and Steve Kass
May 20, 2026

1. The Strait of Hormuz Is a Critical Pressure Point for Global Energy Markets Roughly 20 million barrels of oil and 20% of the world’s LNG moves through the Strait of Hormuz each day, making it one o... READ MORE >
Featured Image
2 min read

Brewing a Smarter Energy Strategy with Eight O'Clock Coffee

By 5
April 27, 2026

Eight O’Clock Coffee is one of America’s original coffee brands, with a long-standing reputation for quality, consistency, and operational excellence. Supporting a national footprint requires dependab... READ MORE >