Find Us

5 Headerquarters

4545 Fuller Dr. Suite 412
Irving, TX 75038
Phone: (972) 445-9584
Toll Free: (855) 275-3483
Fax: (855) 329-3493
email5@energyby5.com

5- Northeast

865 State Route 33
Ste 3 PMB 1077
Freehold, NJ 07728
Phone: (732) 774-0005
Fax: (855) 329-3483
email5@energyby5.com

5- Mexico

CP 11000, Miguel Hidalgo
CDMX, Mexico
Phone: +5595287982
mexico@energyby5.com

LEARN

Category: Markets Education Regulatory

CO-LOCATION OF DATA CENTERS AND POWER PLANTS: THE REGULATORY CROSSROADS

January 14, 2025

Written By: 5

Glowing blue matrix falling in data center

Many of the largest data center owners (e.g. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon) are exploring the co-location of data center load adjacent to new or existing power plants. Energy regulators now struggle to come up with rules that fairly address the co-location of energy-intensive data centers.

The regulation of co-located load is hotly debated. Opponents argue that dedicating existing generation to data centers will decrease the grid’s ability to reliably serve other demand on the grid. Proponents argue that these new data centers need the capacity whether it is located behind or in front of the meter. While the impact of co-location on resource adequacy is not an issue if the new load interconnects with new generation (for example, Microsoft’s plan to repower Three Mile Unit 1 and use the new generation unit to serve its new data center), even when co-located load uses new generation, there are other issues to be addressed.  These include how these co-located loads (whether behind or in front of the meter) pay for access to grid services and/or rely on the grid to back up behind the meter generators.

The regulatory debate is playing out in various cases that are now in front of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Three of the most important that we are following are: (i) FERC’s technical conference on resource adequacy (AD24-11), (ii) Talen’s interconnection request for an Amazon data center to be located adjacent to Talen’s Susquehanna nuclear plant (ER24-2172), and (iii) Exelon’s filing on behalf of six different utilities for new tariffs that address allocating costs to co-located loads (ER24-2888).

The stakes are substantial, with the leading data center owners (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google), generation owners (NRG, Vistra, Calpine, Constellation), and integrated utilities (Exelon, AEP, Southern, Duke), supporting robust litigation and advocacy efforts. Although the outcome of these complex issues is uncertain, it is difficult to bet against the data center owners successfully navigating a regulatory path that facilitates the co-location of data center loads at new or existing power plants given that the combined market capitalization of Amazon, Google, and Microsoft exceeds $7 trillion.

Other Recent Posts

Featured Image
2 min read

Why the Name 5

By 5
May 15, 2025

We spend most of our lives in classes, sports and jobs that reinforce the need to look good and to be right, often at the expense of others. Many of our relationships become a zero-sum game; for me to... READ MORE >
Featured Image
7 min read

Actions to Take Today: Navigating Volatility in U.S. Energy Markets

By 5
May 9, 2025

From tariffs and recession risks to renewables and rising demand, this article outlines actionable procurement strategies tailored to today’s evolving energy landscape. READ MORE >
Featured Image
4 min read

What a 5X Increase in PJM Capacity Costs Means For Your Electric Bill

By 5
April 28, 2025

Capacity costs in the PJM Interconnection cleared at unprecedented levels in the latest auction. As shown below in Figure 1, the cost of capacity increased in many parts of PJM by 5x. While this chart... READ MORE >